Factors versus Composites: Guidelines for Choosing the Right Structural Equation Modeling Method
By Joseph F. Hair, Marko Sarstedt. 2019
357 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Structural equation modeling (SEM) is a widely applied and useful tool for project management scholars. In this Thoughtlet article, we critically reflect on the measurement philosophy underlying the two streams of SEM and their adequacy for estimating relationships among concepts commonly encountered in the field (e.g., team performance). We also discuss considerations to ponder when making the choice between the two types of SEM as well as between SEM and regression analysis.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a9bb112a01528ad8d7c982b4f13494a9e82e896b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Christian M. Ringle
- Marko Sarstedt
- Joseph F. Hair
- Christian Nitzl
- Matt C. Howard
- Jörg Henseler
- Florian Schuberth
- Mikko Rönkkö
Citations in the corpus
- Beyond a tandem analysis of SEM and PROCESS: Use of PLS-SEM for mediation analyses! (2020, background): “These constructs are used to measure broad ideas or thoughts about abstract concepts that researchers seek to investigate (Hair & Sarstedt, 2019).”