Will Nutrient Credit Trading Ever Work? An Assessment of Supply and Demand Problems and Institutional Obstacles
By D. King, P. Kuch. 2003
119 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a99c7e8e33dc6f94e7bc258e49eff31b010193f9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Robert Costanza
- J. Farley
- Hannah L. Jacobs
- C. Schary
- Hanna L. Breetz
- R.W.J. de Groot
- Paul C. Sutton
- Ida Kubiszewski
Citations in the corpus
- Trust and Communication: Mechanisms for Increasing Farmers’ Participation in Water Quality Trading (2005, background): “Yet even when a trading program can get around the logistical complications, farmers are not participating in trading nearly as much as policymakers would like or expect (King and Kuch 2003; Kramer 2003).”
- Payments for ecosystem services: From local to global (2010, background): “The institution that creates the offset scheme is ultimately responsible for monitoring offset quality, and typically bears the often significant costs of doing so (King and Kuch, 2003).”
- Ecosystem services from agriculture: steps for expanding markets. (2010, unknown): “In a real sense, markets for ecosystem services and conservation programs may be competing with each other for the same natural capital, driving up costs to the possible detriment of market development (King and Kuch, 2003).”