Cross-cultural comparisons of traffic safety, risk perception, attitudes and behaviour

By I. Lund, T. Rundmo. 2009

212 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a97740264d32adc47cbbc7746618247da7e1a56b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

1. Sidney W. A. Dekker

In Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

1. T. Rundmo

In Sociology and Political Science

1. S. Jørgensen
2. T. Rundmo
3. T. Nordfjærn

Citations in the corpus

• A cross‐cultural comparison of road traffic risk perceptions, attitudes towards traffic safety and driver behaviour (2011, background): “Miller and Chapman (2001) argued that an analysis of covariance could be an inappropriate statistical method when the groups differ substantially on the included covariates (i.”
• The complexity of failure: Implications of complexity theory for safety investigations (2011, background): “…multiple levels of politeness differentiation (Orasanu and Martin, 1998), effects of fatigue, procedural drift (Snook, 2000), varied training and language standards (Hutchins et al., 2002), as well as cross-cultural differences in risk perceptions, attitudes and behavior (Lund and Rundmo, 2009).”