Compressive strength and microstructure of carbon nanotubes–fly ash cement composites

By A. Chaipanich, T. Nochaiya, W. Wongkeo, P. Torkittikul. 2010

315 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Carbon nanotube–cement composites: A retrospect (2011, background): “Also, Chaipanich et al. (2010)”
Nanotechnology: Advantages and drawbacks in the field of construction and building materials (2011, background): “[30] mentioned that 1% of carbon nanofibers (by binder mass) can compensate the strength reduction associated with the replacement of 20% fly ash.”
Review on concrete nanotechnology (2016, background): “However, the strength of fly ash cement mixes is lower than that of Portland cement, because of lower strength development in fly ash cement because of its long-term pozzolanic reaction (Chaipanich et al., 2010). In this review, it is also important to refer some drawbacks in the success of CNT rein”
Surface-modified graphite nanomaterials for improved reinforcement efficiency in cementitious paste (2013, background): “[18] Chaipanich A, Nochaiya T, Wongkeo W, Torkittikul P.”
Effect of carbon nanotubes on properties of cement mortars (2014, background): “SEM images of carbon nanotubes–fly ash cement composites at (a) 5000 , (b) 10,000 and (c) 30,000 [22].”
Effect of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) on the strength development of cementitious materials (2019, background): “[39] Chaipanich A, Nochaiya T, Wongkeo W, Torkittikul P.”