On the Validity of a Single (Boldness) Assay in Personality Research

By Christa Beckmann, P. Biro. 2013

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a949aef25493374af5d8946e79d934e5e78890f5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. P. Biro
2. J. Stamps
3. Andrew Sih
4. Ton G. G. Groothuis
5. N. Dingemanse
6. A. Bell
7. G. Mittelbach
8. N. Ballew

In Global and Planetary Change

1. P. Biro
2. J. Stamps
3. Andrew Sih
4. A. Bell
5. Denis Réale
6. Ton G. G. Groothuis
7. P. Hurd
8. A. Reddon

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. J. Stamps
2. P. Biro

Citations in the corpus

• Using repeatability to study physiological and behavioural traits: Ignore time-related change at your peril (2015, background): “…implicitly assume that behavioural or physiological traits are highly consistent over time, and then sample each individual only once (reviewed in Beckmann & Biro, 2013; Garamszegi, Markó, & Herczeg, 2012), or test for broad sense repeatability, but do so by only testing each subject twice…”