Global estimates of the impact of a collapse of the West Antarctic ice sheet: an application of FUND

217 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The economic impact of substantial sea-level rise (2010, background): “…was up to 2-m per century, while the costs of sea-level rise increase due to greater damage and protection costs, an optimum response in a benefit-cost sense remains widespread protection of developed coastal areas, as identified in earlier analyses (Nicholls and Tol, 2006, Nicholls et al., 2008).”
Costs of Adapting Coastal Defences to Sea-Level Rise— New Estimates and Their Implications (2013, background): “Rather than presenting point estimates, it is recommended to present and analyse unit cost estimates by means of appropriate bandwidths and sensitivity analysis (cf. Nicholls, Tol, and Vafeidis, 2008).”
Risks of sea level rise to disadvantaged communities in the United States (2013, background): “Secondly, if adaptation responses to coastal risks are likely to be based on some measure of economic efficiency, with more valuable land being more likely to be protected, as suggested by previous studies (Yohe 1990; Nicholls et al. 2008), then are socially vulnerable communities located in high-ri”
Estimating global damages from sea level rise with the Coastal Impact and Adaptation Model (CIAM) (2015, methodology): “3Fankhauser’s reduced-form cost-benefit rule has been formalized in the FUND model (Tol 1996), which has been used for numerous analyses of the economic impacts of SLR (e.g., Darwin and Tol 2001; Nicholls et al. 2008; Tol 2007; Anthoff et al. 2010).”