CONSTANS mediates between the circadian clock and the control of flowering in Arabidopsis

By P. Suárez-López, Kay Wheatley, F. Robson, H. Onouchi, F. Valverde, G. Coupland. Nature, 2001

1,440 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Molecular Biology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a93180edac8256b6f6b1f8eee34ac2910ab82078

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

1. M. Schmid
2. R. Amasino
3. G. Coupland
4. Anusha Srikanth
5. Detlef Weigel
6. M. Hanke
7. F. Fornara
8. F. Turck

In Plant Science

1. R. Amasino
2. M. Schmid
3. G. Coupland
4. Anusha Srikanth
5. Detlef Weigel
6. M. Hanke
7. F. Fornara
8. F. Turck

Citations in the corpus

• Control of flowering time: interacting pathways as a basis for diversity. (2002, background): “However, CO protein is very unstable in light (Suarez-Lopez et al., 2001), and P. nil PnCO protein could also be unstable and a target for degradation in response to NB.”
• The timing of developmental transitions in plants. (2006, background): “CO is a putative transcriptional regulator , and its expression is regulated at several levels (Figure 3) (Putterill et al., 1995; Samach et al., 2000; Suárez-López et al., 2001; Valverde et al., 2004).”
• Seasonal and developmental timing of flowering. (2010, background): “CO expression is affected by the circadian clock (and thus mutants in clock components like GI affect CO expression), and CO is necessary for inducing FT expression in LDs (Suarez-Lopez et al., 2001; Yanovsky and Kay, 2002) (Figure 2).”
• No Flower no Fruit - Genetic Potentials to Trigger Flowering in Fruit Trees (2007, background): “The transcription of CO is enhanced and the gene product is stabilized by blue and dark red light (Suarez-Lopez et al. 2001).”
• A Pseudo-Response Regulator is misexpressed in the photoperiod insensitive Ppd-D1a mutant of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) (2007, background): “This was consistent with our original hypothesis for photoperiod variation in wheat and barley in that photoperiod insensitivity in wheat can be attributed to the induction of FT irrespective of daylength while late Xowering in barley is due to a failure to induce FT correctly in LDs. Final proof th”
• Potent Induction of Arabidopsis thaliana Flowering by Elevated Growth Temperature (2006, positive): “GI encodes a nuclear protein with several roles in light-mediated and stress responses [27–30], while CO functions as the principal output of the photoperiod pathway by integrating circadian with light information [31,32].”
• Multiple Pathways in the Decision to Flower: Enabling, Promoting, and Resetting (2004, background): “These changes in FLC chromatin are dependent on mutations in the vernalization pathway (Bastow et al., 2004; Sung and Amasino, 2004).”
• Regulation of flowering time: all roads lead to Rome (2011, background): “Analysis of FT expression revealed not only that its expression is much higher in long days, but also that it follows a circadian pattern, peaking in the evening [35, 53].”
• The genus Laminaria sensu lato : recent insights and developments (2008, background): “The phenomenon is known to arise from the interaction of photoperiod with the circadian clock in higher plants and vertebrates, although via different mechanisms (e.g. Hastings & Follett, 2001; Suárez-López et al., 2001; Schultz & Kay, 2003).”
• Photoperiodic Flowering: Time Measurement Mechanisms in Leaves (2014, background): “To restrict CO protein activity to the long-day afternoon for proper FT induction, both circadian-clock regulation of CO transcription and photoreceptor regulation of CO protein abundance are necessary (110, 111, 119).”