Robust hash functions for digital watermarking
By J. Fridrich. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Technology, 2000
386 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a9273925c513d8ba6e3a2135bf7203e95710a1d4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Citations in the corpus
- Robust and secure image hashing (2006, methodology): “A solution to this problem is to use secure, content-dependent hash values as a key to generate the watermark [13].”
- Perceptual Image Hashing Via Feature Points: Performance Evaluation and Tradeoffs (2006, background): “The underlying techniques for constructing image hashes can roughly be classified into methods based on image statistics [3], [4] [5], relations [6], [7], preservation of coarse image representation [8], [9], [10], and low-level image feature extraction [11], [12].”
- Implementation and Benchmarking of Perceptual Image Hash Functions (2010, neutral): “[15] proposes such semi-fragile signatures.”
- PhotoProof: Cryptographic Image Authentication for Any Set of Permissible Transformations (2016, neutral): “, [46], [20], [55], [33], [48], [17], [59], [34], [60]).”
- Robust and Secure Image Hashing via Non-Negative Matrix Factorizations (2007, methodology): “Fridrich and Goljan [13] propose a robust hash based on preserving selected (low-frequency) DCT coefficients.”