Association between residential greenness and birth weight: Systematic review and meta-analysis

By A. Dzhambov, D. Dimitrova, E. Dimitrakova. 2014

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Nature Contact and Human Health: A Research Agenda (2017, background): “…et al. 2016 9 Improved postoperative recovery Park and Mattson 2008; Park and Mattson 2009; Ulrich 1984 10 Improved birth outcomes Reviewed by Dzhambov et al. 2014 11 Improved congestive heart failure Mao et al. 2017 12 Improved child development (cognitive and motor) Fjørtoft 2001; Kellert…”
Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health: Theoretical and methodological guidance (2017, methodology): “vegetation level) or green spaces such as parks, gardens and forests (hereon referred to generically only as “greenspace” when both greenness and green spaces are meant; Taylor and Hochuli, 2017) are beneficial for multiple measures of health for urban populations in relatively high-income countries”
Urban natural environments as nature-based solutions for improved public health - A systematic review of reviews. (2017, methodology): “Dzhambov et al. (2014) conducted a meta-analysis and concluded that there is significant, but weak evidence for an association between natural environments and birth weight.”
The health benefits of the great outdoors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of greenspace exposure and health outcomes (2018, background): “Outcomes associated with weight status and birth weight were also excluded, as systematic reviews investigating them have recently been published (Dzhambov et al., 2014; Lachowycz and Jones, 2011; Thompson Coon JB et al., 2011).”