Valorization of Biomass: Deriving More Value from Waste

By C. Tuck, E. Pérez, I. Horváth, R. Sheldon, M. Poliakoff. Science, 2012

1,882 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a8ef455e593ce1adad5f3f619f733ce0ac2e486a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. A. Ragauskas
2. Fang Chen
3. Richard A. Dixon
4. Amit K. Naskar
5. Gregg T. Beckham
6. J. Bastidas-Oyanedel
7. R. Sheldon
8. J. Schmidt

In Molecular Biology

1. A. Ragauskas
2. John M. Woodley
3. Fang Chen
4. Richard A. Dixon
5. Timothy J. Tschaplinski
6. J. Bastidas-Oyanedel
7. R. Sheldon
8. J. Schmidt

Citations in the corpus

• Biobased Terephthalic Acid Technologies: A Literature Review (2014, neutral): “85 The de-oxygenation process is able to produce the desired BTX mix at high yields while minimizing char formation.”
• Role of Biocatalysis in Sustainable Chemistry. (2017, background): “An alternative, second-generation (2G) scenario, more in line with the concept of a circular economy, involves the valorization of waste biomass, 370 such as waste lignocellulose derived from agricultural and forestry residues, triglycerides from waste cooking oil, and even food-supply-chain waste.”