What is Governance
By F. Fukuyama. 2013
1,264 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a8bcb140c6fe9b98a8f24f781aae7cc429de7b3e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
- B. Hughes
- Jacinta C. Nwachukwu
- Jonathan K. Hanson
- Simplice A. Asongu
- Timothy D. Sisk
- R. Sigman
- D. Joshi
In Sociology and Political Science
- Simplice A. Asongu
- Jacinta C. Nwachukwu
- B. Hughes
- Jonathan K. Hanson
- Timothy D. Sisk
- R. Sigman
- D. Joshi
- Vanessa S. Tchamyou
Citations in the corpus
- Improving Governance for the Post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals: Scenario Forecasting the Next 50 years (2015, positive): “…Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is widely acknowledged by the United Nations and most international organizations, domestic and global civil society actors, academic scholars, and policy analysts (Fukuyama, 2013; Hyden, Court, & Mease, 2004; Rothstein, 2011; World Bank, 2011; UNDP, 2012).”
- The Chinese Paradox of High Growth and Low Quality of Government: The Cadre Organization Meets Max Weber (2015, neutral): “On the other hand, The People’s Republic of China (henceforth China) scores comparatively low in all commonly used measures of levels of corruption and the quality of government (QoG) institutions (Fukuyama 2013).”
- The Impact of Terrorism on Governance in African Countries (2017, positive): “Second, according to Fukuyama (2013), a more comprehensive notion of governance encompasses four main features, namely: procedural measures, output measures, indicators of capacity that entail professionalism and resources and bureaucratic measures.”
- The State of State Capacity : a review of concepts, evidence and measures (2013, neutral): “Part of the explanation, he argues, is that the predatory reputation of states among political economy scholars has turned the attention towards power limitation (Fukuyama 2013), or perhaps simply that assessing checks is methodologically easier than assessing execution potential.”
- The Mobile Phone in the Diffusion of Knowledge for Institutional Quality in Sub-Saharan Africa (2016, neutral): “(2) According to Fukuyama (2013), the concept of governance can be consolidated by the comprehension of four principal approaches to ‘state quality’, namely: capacity indicators which encompass professionalism and resource levels, political measures and output indicators. (3) In accordance with Tusa”
- Decentralization and governance: a special issue of World Development, 2013 (2014, neutral): “It is not accidental that some of the most successful national politicians of the last 20 years, including presidents Menem, Rodriguez Saa, and Nestor Kirchner, hail from the three lowest-ranking provinces (La Rioja, San Luis, and Santa Cruz) in the index of subnational democracy compiled by Gervaso”
- Leviathan’s Latent Dimensions: Measuring State Capacity for Comparative Political Research (2013, positive): “…for these dimensions, we hope to have advanced the discussion of the conceptual and measurement issues related to state capacity, addressed recently by, among others, Centeno et al. (2017), Fukuyama (2013), Hendrix (2010), Lindvall and Teorell (2016), Rogers and Weller (2014), and Soifer (2008).”
- The Role of Governance in Mobile Phones for Inclusive Human Development in Sub-Saharan Africa (2016, positive): “Third, according to Fukuyama (2013), the concept of governance can be improved by adopting four principal approaches through which ‘state quality’ can be understood, namely: (i) procedural measures, (ii) output measures; (iii) bureaucratic autonomy measures and (iii) indicators of capacity which…”