The Legal Protection of Crowdworkers: Four Avenues for Workers’ Rights in the Virtual Realm
By J. Prassl, Martin E. Risak. 2017
Subfields: Social Sciences & Humanities
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Sciences & Humanities
- J. Slageren
- Irene Solaiman
- Nikos Koutsimpogiorgos
- Marie-Therese Png
- Koen Frenken
- Zeerak Talat
- Su Lin Blodgett
- A. Herrmann
Citations in the corpus
- Evaluating the Social Impact of Generative AI Systems in Systems and Society (2023, background): “As a result, they can be paid significantly less than minimum wage, have no access to healthcare benefits, are not subject to working time restrictions, and may not have access to holidays or sick leaves [188].”
- Regulating work in the gig economy: What are the options? (2017, background): “Compare Prassl and Risak (2017) proposing a different typology of possible regulatory strategies.”
- Conceptualizing the Gig Economy and Its Regulatory Problems (2020, background): “…relationship, where the following five conditions need to be met in order for a work relationship to qualify as an employer – employee relationship (Prassl & Risak, 2017): the inception and termination of the employment relation - ship, receiving labor and its fruits, providing work and pay,…”
- Negotiating labour standards in the gig economy: Airtasker and Unions New South Wales (2017, background): “Options in this regard are explored by Stewart and Stanford (2017) and Prassl and Risak (2017).”