Interpretation of ambiguous emotional information in clinically anxious children and adolescents

By M. Taghavi, A. Moradi, H. Neshat-Doost, W. Yule, Tim Dalgleish. 2000

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a89d4a285655febe1c2d7919112baac9efac1510

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. A. Richards
2. I. Blanchette

Citations in the corpus

• The influence of affect on higher level cognition: A review of research on interpretation, judgement, decision making and reasoning (2010, background): “The typical finding in empirical studies is that clinically anxious children make more threat-related interpretations of ambiguous stories than non-anxious children (Muris & van der Heiden, 2006 ; Taghavi, Moradi, Neshat-Doost, Yule, & Dalgleish, 2000 ; Waters, Craske, Bergman, & Treanor, 2008 ).”
• Distorted cognition and pathological anxiety in children and adolescents (2008, unknown): “Altogether, these and other studies (eg, Bogels & Zigterman, 2000 ; Chorpita, Albano, & Barlow, 1996 ; Dineen & Hadwin, 2004 ; Taghavi, Moradi, Neshat-Doost, Yule, & Dalgleish, 2000 ) have demonstrated that interpretation bias is a cognitive distortion that occurs in high-anxious and anxiety-dis”