Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation
By Edward Gibson, Leon Bergen, S. Piantadosi. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013
375 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a885f8f943d72cb763db4a7ab0de21be31e81b5a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Trung Bui
- Anh Totti Nguyen
- Morten H. Christiansen
- N. Chater
- Thang M. Pham
- Long Mai
- David E. Over
- Jacob Andreas
In Cognitive Neuroscience
Citations in the corpus
- Out of Order: How important is the sequential order of words in a sentence in Natural Language Understanding tasks? (2020, background): “Gibson et al. 2013 found that humans can also exhibit word-order-invariance effects, especially when one interpretation is much more semantically plausible.”
- Consequences of the Now-or-Never bottleneck for signed versus spoken languages (2015, methodology): “…interest in rational, rather processing-based, explanations in cognitive science (e.g., Anderson 1990; Chater et al. 2006 Griffiths & Tenenbaum 2009; Oaksford & Chater 1998; 2007; Tenenbaum et al. 2011), including language processing (Gibson et al. 2013; Hale 2001; 2006; Piantadosi et al. 2011).”