Drifting subpulses and inner acceleration regions in radio pulsars

By J. Gil, G. Melikidze, U. Geppert. 2003

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The classical vacuum gap model of Ruderman & Sutherland, in which spark-associated subbeams of subpulse emission circulate around the magnetic axis due to the E × B drift of spark plasma filaments, provides a natural and plausible physical mechanism of the subpulse drift phenomenon. Moreover, this is the only model with quantitative predictions that can be compared with observa- tions. Recent progress in the analysis of drifting subpulses in pulsars has provided a strong support to this model by revealing a number of subbeams circulating around the magnetic axis in a manner compatible with theoretical predictions. However, a more detailed analysis revealed that the circulation speed in a pure vacuum gap is too high when compared with observations. Moreover, some pul- sars demonstrate significant time variations of the drift rate, including a change of the apparent drift direction, which is obviously inconsistent with the E × B drift scenario in a pure vacuum gap. We attempted to resolve these discrepancies by considering a partial flow of iron ions from the positively charged polar cap, co- existing with the production of outflowing electron-positron plasmas. The model of such charge-depleted acceleration region is highly sensitive to both the critical ion temperature Ti � 10 6 K (above which ions flow freely with the corotational charge density) and the actual surface temperature Ts of the polar cap, heated by the bombardment of ultra-relativistic charged particles. By fitting the obser- vationally deduced drift-rates to the theoretical values, we managed to estimate polar cap surface temperatures in a number of pulsars. The estimated surface temperatures Ts correspond to a small charge depletion of the order of a few percent of the Goldreich-Julian corotational charge density. Nevertheless, the re-

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a8750dc09e63781906d4c1a8c286f5e4592d212b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. José A. Pons
  2. U. Geppert
  3. S. Guillot
  4. S. Bogdanov
  5. A. Watts
  6. T. E. Riley
  7. Z. Arzoumanian
  8. K. Gendreau

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. José A. Pons
  2. U. Geppert
  3. T. E. Riley
  4. R. Edwards
  5. B. Stappers
  6. S. Guillot
  7. P. Weltevrede
  8. A. Watts

Citations in the corpus