Polyp Miss Rate Determined by Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review

By J. Rijn, J. Reitsma, J. Stoker, Patrick M. M. Bossuyt, S. Deventer, E. Dekker. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2006

1,440 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Epidemiology, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a86a26317d7e26fb1b5ccb24e3543cafc14bfdd4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Oncology

In Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Douglas Rex

Citations in the corpus

Evaluating Test Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Decision Analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2008, methodology): “For colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy, we used the confidence intervals reported in the meta-analysis by van Rijn and colleagues (31) as the range tested.”
Kvasir-SEG: A Segmented Polyp Dataset (2019, background): “type and size of the arXiv:1911.07069v1 [eess.IV] 16 Nov 2019 2 Jha et al. Fig.1: Example frames from the Kvasir dataset where we additionally have marked the polyp tissue with green outlines. polyps [26]. Increasing the detection of polyps has been shown to decrease risk of colorectal cancer [12]. ”
WM-DOVA maps for accurate polyp highlighting in colonoscopy: Validation vs. saliency maps from physicians (2015, background): “The miss-rate increases significantly in smaller sized polyps (2% for adenomas ≥ 10 mm versus 26% for adenomas < 5 mm) [9] and this is meaningful in clinical practice because the prevalence of high grade dysplasia among patients with adenomas is related to the polyp size, with figures that vary from”
ResUNet++: An Advanced Architecture for Medical Image Segmentation (2019, background): “Unfortunately, many adenomatous polyps are missed during the endoscopic examinations [2].”
Clinical Trials for Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Diagnosis: A Cross-Sectional Study of Registered Trials in ClinicalTrials.gov (2020, background): “Because the overall rate of missed polyps is as high as 22%, the associated colorectal cancer after colonoscopy is of concern (26).”
Serrated Lesions of the Colorectum: Review and Recommendations From an Expert Panel (2012, background): “Miss rates for serrated lesions have not been specifically measured in tandem colonoscopy studies (120), but the range of detection rates described thus far indicates that substantial numbers of endoscopists miss more than half of the serrated lesions in the proximal colon (73, 119).”
UNCERTAINTY MODELING AND INTERPRETABILITY IN CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS FOR POLYP SEGMENTATION (2018, background): “However, depending on the size and type, roughly 8 − 37% of polyps are missed during the process [1].”
Adaptive Context Selection for Polyp Segmentation (2020, background): “At present, colonoscopy is the most commonly used means of examination, but this process involves manual and thus expensive labor, not to mention its higher misdiagnosis rate [16].”
Comparative Validation of Polyp Detection Methods in Video Colonoscopy: Results From the MICCAI 2015 Endoscopic Vision Challenge (2017, neutral): “as the ones with higher associated miss-rate [9], [10].”