Eliminating experimental bias in anisotropic-flow measurements of high-energy nuclear collisions

By M. Luzum, J. Ollitrault. 2012

153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We argue that the traditional event-plane method, which is still widely used to analyze anisotropic flow in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions, should be abandoned because flow fluctuations introduce an uncontrolled bias in the measurement. Instead, one should use an alternative, such as the scalar-product method or cumulant method, which always measures an unambiguous property of the underlying anisotropic flow and therefore eliminates this bias, and does so without any disadvantages. It is known that this correction is important for precision comparisons of traditional v_n measurements requiring better than a few percent accuracy. However, we show that it is absolutely essential for correlations between different harmonics, such as those that have been recently measured by the ATLAS Collaboration, which can differ from the nominally-measured quantity by a factor two or more. We also describe how, using the corrected analysis method, the information from different subevents can be combined in order to optimize the precision of analyses.

Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a856c7ac74fc2659181ffeb786f7f36470c653e7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

Citations in the corpus

Elliptic flow of electrons from heavy-flavour hadron decays at mid-rapidity in Pb-Pb collisions at √sNN=2.76 TeV (2016, methodology): “The elliptic flow measurements carried out with the event plane method could lead to ambiguous results lying between the event-averaged mean v2 value and the root-meansquare value, as a consequence of the presence of event-by-event flow fluctuations [67].”