The red‐shift effect and radiation decay on black hole spacetimes

By Mihalis Dafermos, Igor Rodnianski. 2005

270 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We consider solutions to the linear wave equation □gϕ = 0 on a (maximally extended) Schwarzschild spacetime with parameter M > 0, evolving from sufficiently regular initial data prescribed on a complete Cauchy surface Σ, where the data are assumed only to decay suitably at spatial infinity. (In particular, the support of ϕ may contain the bifurcate event horizon.) It is shown that the energy flux F  T̃ϕ (𝒮) of the solution (as measured by a strictly timelike T̃ that asymptotically matches the static Killing field) through arbitrary achronal subsets 𝒮 of the black hole exterior region satisfies the bound F  T̃ϕ (𝒮) ≤ C E(v  −2+ + u  −2+ ), where v and u denote the infimum of the Eddington‐Finkelstein advanced and retarded time of 𝒮, v+ denotes max{1, v}, and u+ denotes max{1, u}, where C is a constant depending only on the parameter M, and E depends on a suitable norm of the solution on the hypersurface t ≐ u + v = 1. (The bound applies in particular to subsets 𝒮 of the event horizon or null infinity.) It is also shown that ϕ satisfies the pointwise decay estimate |ϕ| ≤ C Ev  −1+ in the entire exterior region, and the estimates |rϕ| ≤ CR̃E(1 + |u|)−1/2 and |r1/2ϕ| ≤ CR̃Eu  −1+ in the region {r ≥ R̃} ∩ J+(Σ) for any R̃ > 2M. The estimates near the event horizon exploit an integral energy identity normalized to local observers. This estimate can be thought to quantify the celebrated red‐shift effect. The results in particular give an independent proof of the classical result |ϕ| ≥ C E of Kay and Wald without recourse to the discrete isometries of spacetime. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Mathematical Physics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a85466d33c7d0d8a7e51e6f473765a70e55eeaac

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. S. Aretakis
  2. D. Tataru
  3. András Vasy
  4. Mihalis Dafermos
  5. Igor Rodnianski
  6. P. Blue
  7. Lars-Erik Andersson
  8. Joseph Keir

In Mathematical Physics

  1. S. Aretakis
  2. Igor Rodnianski
  3. D. Tataru
  4. Mihalis Dafermos
  5. András Vasy
  6. Jason Metcalfe
  7. Lars-Erik Andersson
  8. P. Blue

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. S. Aretakis
  2. Igor Rodnianski
  3. Mihalis Dafermos
  4. András Vasy
  5. D. Tataru
  6. Lars-Erik Andersson
  7. P. Blue
  8. P. Hintz

Citations in the corpus