Proximity and localisation of corporate R&D activities

By C. Carrincazeaux, Yannick Lung, Alain Rallet. 2001

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Internationalization of Corporate R&D and the Automotive Industry R&D of East-Central Europe (2012, background): “…proximity, agglomeration tendencies, and face-to-face contact continue to play an important role in automotive R&D (e.g., Boschma 2004, 2005; Carrincazeaux et al. 2001; Gertler 2003; Howells 2002; Lung 2004; Leamer and Storper 2001; Rodríguez-Pose and Crescenzi 2008a, 2008b; Storper and…”
The Scientific Trajectory of the French School of Proximity: Interaction- and Institution-based Approaches to Regional Innovation Systems (2008, background): “Their approach is based on institutional complementarities at the regional level, following previous sectoral approaches (Carrincazeaux et al., 2001).”
Agglomeration and Innovation (2014, result): “For example, Carrincazeaux et al. (2001) find that six regions in France account for 75 percent of all corporate R&D workers, compared with 45 percent of the production workers.”
Linkages and spillovers in global production networks: firm-level analysis of the Czech automotive industry (2016, background): “The clustering of suppliers around assembly plants as well as the clustering of automotive R&D is typical for the contemporary automotive industry and has been well documented (e.g. Carrincazeaux et al., 2001; Frigant and Lung, 2002; Lung, 2004; Sturgeon et al., 2008).”