Macroecological patterns in soil communities
By T. Decaëns. 2010
435 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a8418f414b059bcb9607454eaf5b40d6b6f8df70
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Insect Science
In Plant Science
- Martin Hermy
- K. Verheyen
- A. Kolb
- M. Diekmann
- David A. Coomes
- Takayuki Shiono
- Joe Wan
- Jean-François Ponge
Citations in the corpus
- The global soil community and its influence on biogeochemistry (2019, background): “In species richness, the prokaryotes (bacteria and archaea) are the most diverse components of the soil community, followed by fungi, and then protists and animals, although the majority of all groups remain uncharacterized (58).”
- Global‐scale patterns of assemblage structure of soil nematodes in relation to climate and ecosystem properties (2014, background): “Some soil microorganisms appear to be cosmopolitan (Decaëns, 2010), but there is mounting evidence that several groups of soil fauna show restricted distributions (Smith et al.”
- PAPER Community assembly processes shape an altitudinal gradient of forest biodiversity (2013, methodology): “…dissimilarity index, which showed a significant partial Mantel correlation with the compositional dissimilarity of the oribatids; this pattern most likely resulted from vegetational control of the environmental conditions in the soil ecosystems (Appendix S6; St John et al., 2006; Decaëns, 2010).”
- Soil fauna and soil functions: a jigsaw puzzle (2014, background): “Although competition does not appear to have a strong influence on below-ground communities (Wardle, 2002; Bardgett et al., 2005; Decaëns, 2010), one may assume that biomes/ecosystems are dynamic systems in which different functional assemblages compete for resources leading to competitive ranks,…”
- Light, earthworms, and soil resources as predictors of diversity of 10 soil invertebrate groups across monocultures of 14 tree species (2016, neutral): “Given practical constraints on the number of plant species and communities that can be studied, a predictive framework of plant impacts on soil animal diversity must be based on studies that encompass a relatively small number of plant species.”
- The impact of agricultural practices on soil biota: A regional study (2013, background): “3 Spatiotemporal influences on the distribution of soil biota (Winkler and Kampichler, 2000; 4 Decaëns, 2010; Jangid et al., 2011), as well as the effects of geology and related soil features (Kováč, 5 1994; Popovici and Ciobanu, 2000; Fierer and Jackson, 2006) will be taken into account in our 6…”
- Latitudinal gradients as natural laboratories to infer species' responses to temperature (2013, background): “There is only scarce information available on the global distribution patterns of microscopic below-ground organisms, in spite of their importance for carbon and nutrient cycling and their contribution to global biodiversity (Deca€ens 2010).”
- Metabarcoding and mitochondrial metagenomics of endogean arthropods to unveil the mesofauna of the soil (2016, background): “However, poor knowledge of species diversity and community composition means that soil communities largely remain a 'black box' for biology (Decaëns 2010; Orgiazzi et al. 2015).”