Ionospheric detection of gravity waves induced by tsunamis

By J. Artru, V. Ducic, Hiroo Kanamori, Philippe Lognonné, M. Murakami. 2005

334 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a8413b019091747b0f88d109701df93763650b77

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

In Geophysics

Citations in the corpus

Ionospheric disturbances detected by GPS total electron content observation after the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake (2011, background): “Two-dimensional ionospheric total electron content (TEC) observations using a dense GPS receiver network have recently been employed to examine ionospheric disturbances induced by earthquakes (Ducic et al., 2003; Liu et al., 2010) and tsunamis (Artru et al., 2005).”
Ionospheric gravity waves detected offshore Hawaii after tsunamis (2010, methodology): “The vertical TEC (vTEC) daily variations are then removed by high‐pass filtering [Artru et al., 2005] and gravity waves are highlighted using a”
Infragravity waves: From driving mechanisms to impacts (2018, neutral): “This necessary matching of the speeds of di ﬀ erent wave trains applies to all sorts of wave motions (Hasselmann, 1966), for example the generation of atmospheric waves by tsunamis (e.g. Artru et al., 2005).”
From Sumatra 2004 to Tohoku‐Oki 2011: The systematic GPS detection of the ionospheric signature induced by tsunamigenic earthquakes (2013, methodology): “…by the vertical displacement at the source (AGWepi) and acoustic waves coupled with Rayleigh waves, all the TEC variations shown here are filtered between 1 and 8 mHz as suggested by previous observational [Artru et al., 2005] and theoretical works [Lognonné et al., 1998; Occhipinti et al., 2008a].”
GNSS ionospheric seismology: Recent observation evidences and characteristics (2015, background): “Indeed, the pure gravity wave generated by the tsunami in the overlying atmosphere/ionosphere creates a similar signature of the usually detected Traveling Ionospheric Disturbances (TID) (Artru et al., 2005).”
Propagation of tsunami‐driven gravity waves into the thermosphere and ionosphere (2009, methodology): “[3] Using measurements of TEC from the GPS network in Japan, Artru et al. [2005a] reported observations of an ionospheric disturbance following a tsunami generated by the M = 8.”
Three‐dimensional waveform modeling of ionospheric signature induced by the 2004 Sumatra tsunami (2006, methodology): “, 1996], show strong anomalies in the integrated electron density [Artru et al., 2005b]. These anomalies reach about 3–5 TECU [1TECU = 10e /m]. GPS anomalies shown by DasGupta et al. [2006] are comparable and those detected by Liu et al.”
Imaging and modeling the ionospheric airglow response over Hawaii to the tsunami generated by the Tohoku earthquake of 11 March 2011 (2011, methodology): “[3] The first observation using the very dense Japanese GPS Earth Observation Network (GEONET) was reported in 2005, with the imaging of the ionospheric perturbations related to the trans‐Pacific tsunami generated by the Mw = 8.2 earthquake that occurred in Peru on 23 June 2001 [Artru et al., 2005].”
Ionospheric signatures of Tohoku‐Oki tsunami of March 11, 2011: Model comparisons near the epicenter (2012, positive): “Previous model estimates of the vertical propagation speed of internal gravity waves [e.g., Hines , 1960; Artru et al. , 2005; Galvan et al. , 2011] suggested it should take (cid:1) 1.6 h or longer for a gravity wave generated at the surface to reach the F region peak.”