3D Object Representations for Fine-Grained Categorization
By Jonathan Krause, Michael Stark, Jia Deng, Li Fei-Fei. 2013
4,905 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aerospace Engineering
- Jitendra Malik
- Andreas Geiger
- Leonidas J. Guibas
- Andrea Vedaldi
- Silvio Savarese
- Kristen Grauman
- Abhinav Kumar Gupta
- Sanja Fidler
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Luc Van Gool
- Dacheng Tao
- Ming-Hsuan Yang
- Trevor Darrell
- Xiaogang Wang
- Jitendra Malik
- Yi Yang
- Andrew Zisserman
Citations in the corpus
- Fixing the train-test resolution discrepancy (2019, methodology): “We evaluated it on the following datasets: Stanford Cars [16], CUB-200-2011 [36], Oxford 102 Flowers [23], Oxford-IIIT Pets [25] and Birdsnap [4].”
- Bootstrap Your Own Latent: A New Approach to Self-Supervised Learning (2020, methodology): “We perform transfer via linear classification and fine-tuning on the same set of datasets as in [8], namely Food-101 dataset [89], CIFAR-10 [78] and CIFAR-100 [78], Birdsnap [90], the SUN397 scene dataset [79], Stanford Cars [91], FGVC Aircraft [92], the PASCAL VOC 2007 classification task [80], the”
- Fine-Grained Image Classification via Combining Vision and Language (2017, background): “domains have been covered, such as bird types [6, 7], dog species [8], plant breeds [9] , car types [10] and aircraft models [11].”
- Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attention (2020, neutral): “• Our models pre-learned on Imagenet are competitive when transferred to different downstream tasks such as fine-grained classification, on several popular public benchmarks: CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, Flowers, Stanford Cars and iNaturalist-18/19.”
- Grafit: Learning fine-grained image representations with coarse labels (2020, methodology): “Flowers-102 [41] 2,040 6,149 102 Stanford Cars [35] 8,144 8,041 196 Food101 [7] 75,750 25,250 101”
- Projected GANs Converge Faster (2021, methodology): “We compare on LSUN cat and horse [84], ADE indoor (a subset of ADE [91] proposed in [3]), the full Oxford flowers dataset with 8k images [56], KITTI-fisheye (a subset of KITTI-360 [46], consisting of fisheye images), STL-10 [8], CUB200 [80], Stanford Dogs [36], and Stanford Cars [42].”
- CLOOB: Modern Hopfield Networks with InfoLOOB Outperform CLIP (2021, methodology): “Stanford Cars (Krause et al., 2013) (Ilharco et al., 2021), we include the original CLIP results (Radford et al., 2021, Table 12).”
- Unsupervised Embedding Learning via Invariant and Spreading Instance Feature (2019, methodology): “We follow the experimental settings described in [32] to conduct experiments on CUB200-2011(CUB200) [43], Stanford Online Product (Product) [32] and Car196 [22] datasets.”
- Semantic Image Inpainting with Deep Generative Models (2016, methodology): “We evaluate our method on three dataset: the CelebFaces Attributes Dataset (CelebA) [23], the Street View House Numbers (SVHN) [29] and the Stanford Cars Dataset [17].”
- Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference time (2022, methodology): “, 2016), Stanford Cars (Krause et al., 2013) and ImageNet (Deng et al.”
- Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervision (2021, background): “, 2012), Stanford Cars (Krause et al., 2013), and Food101 (Bossard et al.”
- Extreme Clicking for Efficient Object Annotation (2017, background): “A qualification test is a good mechanism for enhancing the quality of crowd-sourcing data and for filtering out bad annotators and spammers [1, 19, 33, 37].”
- On Calibration of Modern Neural Networks (2017, background): “Scaling Vector Scaling Matrix Scaling Birds ResNet 50 22.54% 55.02% 23.37% 37.76% 22.54% 22.99% 29.51% Cars ResNet 50 14.28% 16.24% 14.9% 19.25% 14.28% 14.15% 17.98% CIFAR-10 ResNet 110 6.21% 6.45% 6.36% 6.25% 6.21% 6.37% 6.42% CIFAR-10 ResNet 110 (SD) 5.64% 5.59% 5.62% 5.55% 5.64% 5.62% 5.69% CIFAR”
- AutoHAS: Differentiable Hyper-parameter and Architecture Search (2020, background): “We demonstrate the effectiveness of our AutoHAS on five vision datasets, i.e., ImageNet [7], Birdsnap [3], CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 [29], and Cars [28], and a NLP dataset, i.e., SQuAD 1.1 [39].”