Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview: development, reliability, and validity in an adolescent sample.

By Matthew K. Nock, Elizabeth B. Holmberg, Valerie I. Photos, Bethany D. Michel. Psychological Assessment, 2007

1,261 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a80fae7c0439114cb491b51c3039e388d1c7a2be

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. J. Chin
2. Catherine R. Glenn
3. E. Klonsky
4. K. Dixon-Gordon
5. N. Harrison
6. R. Roesch
7. Craig J. Bryan
8. Alexis M. May

In Psychiatry and Mental health

1. J. Chin
2. Catherine R. Glenn
3. K. Dixon-Gordon
4. N. Harrison
5. R. Roesch
6. E. Klonsky

Citations in the corpus

• Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Within Offender Populations: A Systematic Review (2012, positive): “Both the Suicide Attempt Self-Injury Interview (Linehan, Comtois, Brown, Heard, & Wagner, 2006 ) and the Self-Injurious thoughts and Behavior Interview (Nock, Holmberg, Photos, & Michel, 2007 ) provide comprehensive assessment of NSSI and suicide attempts.”
• Non-suicidal self-injury in United States adults: prevalence, sociodemographics, topography and functions (2011, methodology): “Specifically, items from the Self-injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview (SITBI ; Nock et al. 2007) – a reliable and valid measure of self-injurious thoughts and behaviors – were utilized to assess : (a) methods of NSSI (e.g. cutting, burning) ; (b) age of onset and most recent NSSI ; (c) time…”
• The relationship between non-suicidal self-injury and suicidality (2016, background): “Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview (SITBI; Nock et al., 2007).”
• Moral Injury, Suicidal Ideation, and Suicide Attempts in a Military Sample (2014, methodology): “The interview has good interrater reliability, test–retest reliability, and demonstrates strong convergent validity with other measures of suicidal ideation (Nock et al., 2007), but the self-report version’s psychometric properties have not been published.”
• Assessing the functions of non-suicidal self-injury: Psychometric properties of the Inventory of Statements About Self-injury (ISAS) (2008, background): “For example, one may utilize a comprehensive and valid measure to document the presence and topography of NSSI (e.g., the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview; Nock et al., 2007), and then administer the ISAS to comprehensively assess NSSI functions.”