Dispersal and establishment of floodplain grassland species as limiting factors in restoration

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Prospects for fen meadow restoration on severely degraded fens (2010, background): “in experimental studies (Vegelin et al., 1997; Bischoff, 2002; Middleton et al., 2006a) as well as been predicted from trait analyses (Ozinga et al.”
Plant colonization after managed realignment: the relative importance of diaspore dispersal (2005, background): “development may be because of dispersal constraints of the target species (Onaindia, Albizu & Amezaga 2001; Bakker et al. 2002; Bischoff 2002; Bissels et al. 2004) or environmental conditions that are unsuitable for their”
Dispersal phenology of hydrochorous plants in relation to discharge, seed release time and buoyancy of seeds: the flood pulse concept supported (2004, background): “There is increasing evidence that dispersal limitation may constrain the (re)establishment of target species in fragmented landscapes, especially in restored or newly created habitats lacking a viable propagule bank including wetlands (Bischoff 2002; Middleton 2002; Wheeler et al .”
Importance of regional species pools and functional traits in colonization processes: predicting re-colonization after large-scale destruction of ecosystems (2008, background): “Small-scale restoration projects have shown that immigra tion via LDD is of limited success (e.g. Verhagen et al 2001; Bischoff 2002); hence, the special features of large-scale mined areas seem to influence colonization probability.”