Utility of Environmental DNA for Monitoring Rare and Indicator Macroinvertebrate Species

By E. Mächler, K. Deiner, P. Steinmann, F. Altermatt. Freshwater Science, 2014

182 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract: Accurate knowledge of the distribution of rare, indicator, or invasive species is required for conservation and management decisions. However, species monitoring done with conventional methods may have limitations, such as being laborious in terms of cost and time, and often requires invasive sampling of specimens. Environmental DNA (eDNA) has been identified as a molecular tool that could overcome these limitations, particularly in aquatic systems. Detection of rare and invasive amphibians and fish in lake and river systems has been effective, but few studies have targeted macroinvertebrates in aquatic systems. We expanded eDNA techniques to a broad taxonomic array of macroinvertebrate species in river and lake systems. We were able to detect 5 of 6 species (Ancylus fluviatilis, Asellus aquaticus, Baetis buceratus, Crangonyx pseudogracilis, and Gammarus pulex) with an eDNA method in parallel to the conventional kicknet-sampling method commonly applied in aquatic habitats. Our eDNA method showed medium to very high consistency with the data from kicknet-sampling and was able to detect both indicator and nonnative macroinvertebrates. Furthermore, our primers detected target DNA in concentrations down to 10-5 ng/µL of total extracted tissue DNA in the absence of background eDNA in the reaction. We demonstrate that an eDNA surveillance method based on standard PCR can deliver biomonitoring data across a wide taxonomic range of macroinvertebrate species (Gastropoda, Isopoda, Ephemeroptera, and Amphipoda) in riverine habitats and may offer the possibility to deliver data on a more refined time scale than conventional methods when focusing on single or few target species. Such information based on nondestructive sampling may allow rapid management decisions and actions.

Subfields: Ecology, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a7fad35cdadff05888f47548b81ef020ef0f0323

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Molecular Biology

Citations in the corpus

Environmental DNA particle size distribution from Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) (2015, background): “…species (e.g., Jerde et al. 2011) and endangered native species (e.g., Biggs et al. 2015) including fishes (Takahara et al. 2013) amphibians (Pilliod et al. 2013), reptiles (Piaggio et al. 2013), mollusks (Goldberg et al. 2013), arthropods (Mächler et al. 2014), and mammals (Foote et al. 2012).”
Is the insect apocalypse upon us? How to find out (2020, background): “, 2014), smart insect cameras, and eDNA (Mächler et al., 2014) to LIDAR (Simonson et al.”
Benchmarking DNA Metabarcoding for Biodiversity-Based Monitoring and Assessment (2016, background): “…studies have used extracellular DNA from the water column to detect vertebrates (Ficetola et al., 2008; Thomsen et al., 2012; Valentini et al., 2016) freshwater macroinvertebrates (Goldberg et al., 2013; Mächler et al., 2014) and benthic eukaryotes (Guardiola et al., 2015; Pearman et al., 2016).”
How will the ‘molecular revolution’ contribute to biological recording? (2015, background): “…Ships ballast Detection of IAS Microfluidic chip Mahon et al., 2011 River shrimp (Gammarus pulex) River Detecting indicator species Standard PCR Mächler et al., 2014 Tadpole shrimp (Lepidurus apus) Temporary pools Monitoring biodiversity qPCR Thomsen et al., 2012b Red swamp crayfish…”
Freshwater biomonitoring in the Information Age (2017, background): “or to monitor rare and indicator species (Mächler et al. 2014).”
The ecology of environmental DNA and implications for conservation genetics (2016, background): “In terms of detection capabilities, the success of eDNA monitoring in aquatic environments has compared well with more traditional kick net sampling of benthic macroinvertebrates in Switzerland streams (Mächler et al. 2014).”
Can DNA-Based Ecosystem Assessments Quantify Species Abundance? Testing Primer Bias and Biomass—Sequence Relationships with an Innovative Metabarcoding Protocol (2015, background): “COI barcoding methods are well established for freshwater organisms [16,17,25] and initial studies have tested their potential for freshwater ecosystem assessments using classical Sangerbased sequencing [14,26].”
Methods for the extraction, storage, amplification and sequencing of DNA from environmental samples (2018, background): “Aquatic invertebrates are commonly concentrated during capture using kick-net samplers (Machler et al. 2014).”