R&D, International Sourcing, and the Joint Impact on Firm Performance

229 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Trade, Quality Upgrading, and Input Linkages: Theory and Evidence from Colombia (2018, background): “For computational convenience, we make two normalizations that imply that z and ΦL do not enter the firm’s problem (12).”
A toolkit of policies to promote innovation (2019, background): “Encouragingly, these more direct measures also seem to increase (with a lag) following tax changes (for US evidence, see Lucking 2018 and Akcigit et al. 2018; for the UK, see Dechezlepretre et al. 2016; for China, see Chen et al. 2017; and for Norway, see Bøler et al. 2015).”
The Origins of Firm Heterogeneity: A Production Network Approach (2019, background): “…inputs from domestic and foreign suppliers matters for ﬁrms’ marginal costs and product quality, and thereby performance (e.g., Goldberg et al., 2010, Bøler et al., 2015, Manova et al., 2015, Fieler et al., 2018, Antràs et al., 2017, Boehm and Oberﬁeld, 2020 and Bernard et al., 2019), while ﬁnal…”
The Impact of Trade Liberalization on Firm Productivity and Innovation (2018, unknown): “2018; Coelli, Moxnes, and Ulltveit‑ Moe 2018; Munch and Schaur 2018).”
Offshoring and Labor Markets (2018, methodology): “Examples include Verhoogen (2008), using Mexican data and the peso crisis, and Bøler, Moxnes, and Ulltveit-Moe (2015), using Norwegian data and a change in R&D tax credit.”