Biocomplexity and restoration of biodiversity in temperate coniferous forest: inducing spatial heterogeneity with variable‐density thinning

187 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Contemporary forest restoration: A review emphasizing function (2014, background): “…Sullivan et al. (2001), Gibbons et al. (2010), Gustafsson et al. (2010) and Ribe et al. (2013) Thinning Aubry et al. (1999), Kenk and Guehne (2001), Carey (2003), O’Hara and Waring (2005), Waring and O’Hara (2005), Pastur et al. (2009), O’Hara et al. (2010), Baker and Read (2011) and Gustafsson…”
Wildlife species associated with non-coniferous vegetation in Pacific Northwest conifer forests: A review (2007, background): “Terms such as ‘‘vertical and horizontal hetero- geneity’’, ‘‘structural complexity,’’ and ‘‘biocomplexity’’ have been used to describe conditions of forest stands that are desirable for fostering faunal diversity (Carey, 2003; Lindenmayer et al., 2006).”
Biodiversity response to intensive biomass production from forest thinning in North American forests – A meta-analysis (2011, background): “However, intermediate or variable density treatments may produce habitat for generalists and closed canopy or arboreal specialists (Carey and Wilson, 2001; Lehmkuhl et al., 2002; Carey, 2003).”