Sex Estimation in Forensic Anthropology: Skull Versus Postcranial Elements

By M. K. Spradley, Richard Jantz. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2011

608 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Archeology, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a7d48f59efac7909f0835411450dc9dc156a3af4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. J. Eerkens
2. C. Kiesow
3. L. A. Regan
4. H. Klaus
5. B. Durbin-Johnson
6. Julia M. Yip
7. David M. Rocke
8. G. Parker

Citations in the corpus

• Sex estimation using sexually dimorphic amelogenin protein fragments in human enamel (2019, methodology): “It is logical that recent studies have raised and then demonstrated the potential for using the Y-chromosome form of amelogenin as a means of sexing enamel samples (Porto et al., 2011a; Porto et al., 2011b; Stewart et al., 2016).”