Antarctic mass rates from GRACE

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Computations of the viscoelastic response of a 3-D compressible Earth to surface loading: an application to Glacial Isostatic Adjustment in Antarctica and Canada (2012, unknown): “…history and mantle viscosity profile are generally assumed to be the largest source of uncertainty when using GRACE time-variable satellite gravity data to estimate present-day thinning rates of the Antarctic ice sheet (Chen et al. 2006, 2008, 2009; Velicogna & Wahr 2006; Velicogna 2009).”
Detection of Continental Hydrology and Glaciology Signals from GRACE: A Review (2008, methodology): “GRACE-derived mass balance estimates of Antarctica (Velicogna and Wahr 2006a), Greenland (Velicogna and Wahr 2006b; Chen et al. 2006a ) or both ice sheets (Ramillien”
Contemporary sea level rise. (2010, methodology): “Recent results from GRACE (Velicogna & Wahr 2006a, Ramillien et al. 2006, Chen et al. 2006a, Lutchke et al. 2006, Cazenave et al. 2009, Wouters et al. 2008, Peltier 2009) and ICESat (Slobbe et al. 2009) confirm other remote-sensing results (e.g., Rignot et al. 2008b), i.e., ice mass loss from…”
Increasing rates of ice mass loss from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets revealed by GRACE (2009, background): “Previously published estimates of the Greenland ice mass loss range from 101 Gt/yr to 227 Gt/yr [Velicogna and Wahr, 2005, 2006b; Chen et al., 2006a, 2006b; Luthcke et al., 2006; Ramillien et al., 2006; Wouters et al., 2008].”