Ocean scale hypoxia‐based habitat compression of Atlantic istiophorid billfishes

By E. Prince, Jiangang Luo, C. Goodyear, J. Hoolihan, D. Snodgrass, Eric S. Orbesen, Joseph E. Serafy, M. Ortiz, M. Schirripa. 2010

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Oxygen minimum zones (OMZs) below near-surface optimums in the eastern tropical seas are among the largest contiguous areas of naturally occurring hypoxia in the world oceans, and are predicted to expand and shoal with global warming. In the eastern tropical Pacific (ETP), the surface mixed layer is defined by a shallow thermocline above a barrier of cold hypoxic water, where dissolved oxygen levels are ≤3.5 mL L−1. This thermocline (∼25–50 m) constitutes a lower hypoxic habitat boundary for high oxygen demand tropical pelagic billfish and tunas (i.e., habitat compression). To evaluate similar oceanographic conditions found in the eastern tropical Atlantic (ETA), we compared vertical habitat use of 32 sailfish (Istiophorus platypterus) and 47 blue marlin (Makaira nigricans) monitored with pop-up satellite archival tags in the ETA and western North Atlantic (WNA). Both species spent significantly greater proportions of their time in near-surface waters when inside the ETA than when in the WNA. We contend that the near-surface density of billfish and tunas increases as a consequence of the ETA OMZ, therefore increasing their vulnerability to overexploitation by surface gears. Because the ETA OMZ encompasses nearly all Atlantic equatorial waters, the potential impacts of overexploitation are a concern. Considering the obvious differences in catchability inside and outside the compression zones, it seems essential to standardize these catch rates separately to minimize inaccuracies in stock assessments for these species. This is especially true in light of global warming, which will likely exacerbate future compression impacts.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a7b5cfe1fd16e795fb1acfdc7635eacc6e21444b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. K. Brander
  2. I. Senina
  3. M. Peck
  4. P. Lehodey
  5. A. Rowden
  6. J. Rice
  7. K. Drinkwater
  8. B. MacKenzie

In Oceanography

  1. L. Levin
  2. C. Smith
  3. J. King
  4. H. Loeng
  5. Malcolm R. Clark
  6. Xabier Irigoien
  7. G. Huse
  8. A. Rowden

Citations in the corpus