The Multiscale Morphology Filter: Identifying and Extracting Spatial Patterns in the Galaxy Distribution

By Miguel Angel Aragon-Calvo, Bernard J. T. Jones, Rien van de Weygaert, J. V. G. K. A. Institute, J. University. 2007

200 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Aims. We present here a new method, MMF, for automatically segmenting cosmic structure into its basic components: clusters, fi laments, and walls. Importantly, the segmentation is scale independent, so all structures are identified without prejudice as to the ir size or shape. The method is ideally suited for extracting catalogues of clusters, wa lls, and filaments from samples of galaxies in redshift surve ys or from particles in cosmological N-body simulations: it makes no prior assumptions about the scale or shape of the structures. Methods. Our Multiscale Morphology Filter (MMF) method has been developed on the basis of visualization and feature extraction t echniques in computer vision and medical research. The density or intensity field of the sample is smoothed over a range of scales. Th e smoothed signals are processed through a morphology response filter whose for m is dictated by the particular morphological feature it see ks to extract, and depends on the local shape and spatial coherence of the intensity field. The morphology signal at each location is then defi ned to be the one with the maximum response across the full range of smoothing scales. The success of our method in identifying anisotropic features such as filaments and walls depends critically on the use of an optimally defined intensity field. This is accomplished by applying the DTFE re construction methodology to the sample particle or galaxy distribution. Results. We have tested our MMF Filter against a set of heuristic models of weblike patterns such as are seen in the Megaparsec cosmic matter distribution. To test its effectiveness in the context of more realistic configurations w e also present preliminary results from the MMF analysis of an N-body model. Comparison with alternative prescriptions for feature extraction shows that MMF is a remarkably strong structure finder

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a7b3a24d54273bf002dd38a5d15c0e6171346cdb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Volker Springel
  2. Simon D. M. White
  3. Carlos S. Frenk
  4. Andrey V. Kravtsov
  5. P. Hopkins
  6. James S. Bullock
  7. L. Hernquist
  8. M. Vogelsberger

In Instrumentation

  1. Volker Springel
  2. Simon D. M. White
  3. Carlos S. Frenk
  4. P. Hopkins
  5. M. Vogelsberger
  6. L. Hernquist
  7. Andrey V. Kravtsov
  8. F. V. D. Bosch

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. Volker Springel
  2. Simon D. M. White
  3. Thierry Sousbie
  4. M. Vogelsberger
  5. Rien van de Weygaert
  6. Marius Cautun
  7. Bernard J. T. Jones
  8. Mark Neyrinck

Citations in the corpus