A Speech Intelligibility Index-based approach to predict the speech reception threshold for sentences in fluctuating noise for normal-hearing listeners.
By K. S. Rhebergen, N. Versfeld. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2005
316 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Speech and Hearing, Signal Processing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a78f147e51e40cd99d4a90dcd223d0aa56fc34ea
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Deliang Wang
- P. Loizou
- Jesper Højvang Jensen
- Cees H. Taal
- Y. Hu
- Richard Christian Hendriks
- Yuxuan Wang
- Donald S. Williamson
In Speech and Hearing
In Signal Processing
- Deliang Wang
- P. Loizou
- Y. Hu
- Jesper Højvang Jensen
- Cees H. Taal
- Richard Christian Hendriks
- Yuxuan Wang
- Jianfen Ma
Citations in the corpus
- Factors Affecting Speech Understanding in Older Adults (2010, background): “It has not been developed for application to many other forms of temporally distorted speech, such as interrupted or time-compressed speech, or for temporally fluctuating background noise, although there have been attempts to extend the framework to at least some of these cases (e.g., Dubno et al. 2”
- Objective measures for predicting speech intelligibility in noisy conditions based on new band-importance functions. (2009, background): “…speech intelligibility better than the traditional AI measure when evaluated with sentences embedded in artificial masking signals e.g., periodically interrupted noise and speech-like maskers, but the predictions with the latter maskers were found to be less accurate Rhebergen and Versfeld, 2005 .”
- An Algorithm for Predicting the Intelligibility of Speech Masked by Modulated Noise Maskers (2016, methodology): “The implementation uses stationary speech-shaped Gaussian noise instead of undistorted real speech signals as input (as specified in [3], [6]), but excludes the upward-spread-of-masking functionality as de-fined in [3], because this appears to degrade performance.”
- A short-time objective intelligibility measure for time-frequency weighted noisy speech (2010, background): “[5, 6] and STI (see [7] for an overview of STI-based measures).”
- On the information rate of speech communication (2017, background): “The resulting relation in [7] between intelligibility and environmental noise spectra closely resembles that of the heuristically derived measures such as the articulation index (AI), e.g., [8, 9], and the speech intelligibility index (SII) [10, 11].”