Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action

By Scott Glover. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2004

644 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a786c914d01c6374d59785a6024c76777899415e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Young children make scale errors when playing with dolls. (2006, background): “The phenomenon of scale errors by young children thus contributes to a growing body of developmental research based on dual process theories of visual processing ( Glover, 2002, 2004; Milner & Goodale, 1995) and extends it in three ways.”
Acquisition, representation, and control of action (2009, background): “The model has been widely discussed, and a number of theoretical flaws (Glover, 2004; Hommel et al., 2001) and empirical inconsistencies (e.g., Bruno, 2001; Franz, 2001; Jackson, 2000; Rossetti & Pisella, 2002) have been pointed out, but the basic distinction between the off-line planning process…”
A Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective on Bimanual Coordination and Interference (2004, background): “Furthermore, the role of the inferior parietal lobe appears to be most prominent in the planning of actions rather than their online control ( Glover in press ).”
Ratios: A short guide to confidence limits and proper use (2007, background): “Background: The planning/control model of action (Glover & Dixon, 2001a; Glover, 2004, 2002) assumes that grasping is sensitive to certain illusionary changes of object–size only in early stages of the movement (planning), but not in later stages (control).”
IDEOMOTOR ACTION CONTROL: ON THE PERCEPTUAL GROUNDING OF VOLUNTARY ACTIONS AND AGENTS (2011, background): “According to Milner and Goodale (1995) and Glover (2004), consciousness gets access to higher-level processes (or their products) only while lower-level online processes are not consciously accessible in principle.”
Using diffusion imaging to study human connectional anatomy. (2009, background): “This is a region that we know a great deal about in the macaque monkey, but correspondences with human parietal cortex are not always clear (Glover 2004, Husain & Nachev 2007).”
Embodied Language: A Review of the Role of the Motor System in Language Comprehension (2008, methodology): “Biases in response selection (such as the affordance effects) would be attributed to early motor planning while the subsequent control phase would reflect veridical and unbiased vision (Glover, 2004).”