Inputs and outputs of mercury from terrestrial watersheds: a review

By D. F. Grigal. 2002

471 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Synthesis of Progress and Uncertainties in Attributing the Sources of Mercury in Deposition (2007, background): “500 000 T by some early estimates), land use and climate changes, as well as fire also have the known ability to mobilize some portion of these pools, both to air and water (49).”
An overview of mercury concentrations in freshwater fish species: a national fish mercury dataset for Canada (2013, background): “…ultimately uptake and transfer through the aquatic food web into fish (Winfrey and Rudd 1990; Bodaly et al. 1993; Cabana et al. 1994; St. Louis et al. 1994; Driscoll et al. 1995; Kidd et al. 1995; Benoit et al. 1999; Hrabik andWatras 2002; Grigal 2002; Pickhardt et al. 2002; Graydon et al. 2008).”
Biological Mercury Hotspots in the Northeastern United States and Southeastern Canada (2007, background): “Landscape characteristics including shallow hydrologic flowpaths (Grigal 2002, Galloway and Branfireun 2004), the presence of wetlands (St. Louis et al. 1994), and unproductive surface waters (Chen et al. 2005) facilitate the transport, methylation, and bioconcentration of Hg in surface waters,…”