The Effects of Aquatic Invasive Species on Property Values: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment

By Eric J. Horsch, D. Lewis. Land Economics, 2009

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a75737c925f800490d2f791ad42ea45496420fe0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. N. Hanley
2. M. Roberts
3. George Marbuah
4. B. Mckie
5. Ing-Marie Gren
6. S. Mourato
7. J. Kenter
8. C. Spash

In Global and Planetary Change

1. M. Roberts
2. N. Hanley
3. George Marbuah
4. B. Mckie
5. Ing-Marie Gren

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. M. Roberts
2. N. Hanley
3. George Marbuah
4. B. Mckie
5. Ing-Marie Gren
6. C. Spash
7. R. Turner

Citations in the corpus

• Economics of Harmful Invasive Species: A Review (2014, methodology): “Two of the studies, [41,42], apply choice experiment and hedonic methodologies, respectively, in assessing damage costs of aquatic invasive species.”
• The economic benefits of invasive species management (2019, methodology): “The method can be used to value the economic benefits of managing invasive species which impact house prices: examples include the effects of nonnative aquatic plants on house values in the US (Horsch & Lewis, 2009; Zhang & Boyle, 2010).”
• Do 'Capitalization Effects' for Public Goods Reveal the Public's Willingness to Pay? (2014, unknown): “Recent studies have used the time-constant gradient assumption (henceforth TCGA) to translate capitalization effects into welfare measures for changes in cancer risk (Davis 2004), crime risk (Linden and Rockoff 2008, Pope 2008), hazardous waste (Greenstone and Gallagher 2008), invasive species (Hors”