Global sensitivity analysis in hydrological modeling: Review of concepts, methods, theoretical framework, and applications

By Xiaomeng Song, Jianyun Zhang, Che-sheng Zhan, Yunqing Xuan, Ming Ye, Chonggang Xu. 2015

562 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Sensitivity analysis (SA) aims to identify the key parameters that affect model performance and it plays important roles in model parameterization, calibration, optimization, and uncertainty quantification. However, the increasing complexity of hydrological models means that a large number of parameters need to be estimated. To better understand how these complex models work, efficient SA methods should be applied before the application of hydrological modeling. This study provides a comprehensive review of global SA methods in the field of hydrological modeling. The common definitions of SA and the typical categories of SA methods are described. A wide variety of global SA methods have been introduced to provide a more efficient evaluation framework for hydrological modeling. We review, analyze, and categorize research into global SA methods and their applications, with an emphasis on the research accomplished in the hydrological modeling field. The advantages and disadvantages are also discussed and summarized. An application framework and the typical practical steps involved in SA for hydrological modeling are outlined. Further discussions cover several important and often overlooked topics, including the relationship between parameter identification, uncertainty analysis, and optimization in hydrological modeling, how to deal with correlated parameters, and time-varying SA. Finally, some conclusions and guidance recommendations on SA in hydrological modeling are provided, as well as a list of important future research directions that may facilitate more robust analyses when assessing hydrological modeling performance. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Environmental Engineering, Water Science and Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a7567ee97278f7d463f7c889f4058b4db62508fb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

  1. Fanny Sarrazin
  2. Thorsten Wagener
  3. Francesca Pianosi
  4. A. Hartmann
  5. Moses Kwame Aidoo
  6. Naftali Lazarovitch
  7. Sabine J. Seidel
  8. Ming Ye

In Environmental Engineering

  1. Fanny Sarrazin
  2. Francesca Pianosi
  3. H. Dai
  4. Thorsten Wagener
  5. Ming Ye
  6. A. Hartmann
  7. Moses Kwame Aidoo
  8. Naftali Lazarovitch

In Water Science and Technology

  1. Ming Ye
  2. Francesca Pianosi
  3. H. Dai
  4. Fanny Sarrazin
  5. Jirka Šimůnek
  6. Thorsten Wagener
  7. Hoshin V. Gupta
  8. Jasper A. Vrugt

Citations in the corpus