Estimation of the Transmission Risk of the 2019-nCoV and Its Implication for Public Health Interventions
By B. Tang, Xia Wang, Qian Li, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi, Sanyi Tang, Yanni Xiao, Jianhong Wu. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2020
1,389 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Since the emergence of the first cases in Wuhan, China, the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infection has been quickly spreading out to other provinces and neighboring countries. Estimation of the basic reproduction number by means of mathematical modeling can be helpful for determining the potential and severity of an outbreak and providing critical information for identifying the type of disease interventions and intensity. A deterministic compartmental model was devised based on the clinical progression of the disease, epidemiological status of the individuals, and intervention measures. The estimations based on likelihood and model analysis show that the control reproduction number may be as high as 6.47 (95% CI 5.71–7.23). Sensitivity analyses show that interventions, such as intensive contact tracing followed by quarantine and isolation, can effectively reduce the control reproduction number and transmission risk, with the effect of travel restriction adopted by Wuhan on 2019-nCoV infection in Beijing being almost equivalent to increasing quarantine by a 100 thousand baseline value. It is essential to assess how the expensive, resource-intensive measures implemented by the Chinese authorities can contribute to the prevention and control of the 2019-nCoV infection, and how long they should be maintained. Under the most restrictive measures, the outbreak is expected to peak within two weeks (since 23 January 2020) with a significant low peak value. With travel restriction (no imported exposed individuals to Beijing), the number of infected individuals in seven days will decrease by 91.14% in Beijing, compared with the scenario of no travel restriction.
Subfields: Infectious Diseases, Modeling and Simulation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a74cec58b08636c930fc8d9d12dad6471ae1cc29
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Modeling and Simulation
- Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar
- Dumitru Băleanu
- Ilyas Khan
- Thabet Abdeljawad
- Arran Fernandez
- Mehmet Yavuz
- Behzad Ghanbari
- Amin Jajarmi
Citations in the corpus
- Psychological Impact of COVID-19 and Lockdown among University Students in Malaysia: Implications and Policy Recommendations (2020, background): “Other stressors include students’ place of residence, family income stability [3,36], parents’ psychological status [37], reduced social interactions [38], increased number of new cases and affected provinces [13], and the imposition of travel bans affecting daily life [39].”
- How simulation modelling can help reduce the impact of COVID-19 (2020, methodology): “Using data from China, Lin et al. (2020), Fang et al. (2020), and Tang et al. (2020) all use an SEIR model to both describe the epidemic and assess the impact of mass social isolation policies.”
- The epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19 (2020, methodology): “However, a deterministic compartmental model based on the likelihood and a model analysis showed that the control reproduction number may be as high as 6.47 [12] .”
- Analysis and Dynamics of Fractional Order Mathematical Model of COVID-19 in Nigeria Using Atangana-Baleanu Operator (2021, background): “317 × 10 [15] d covid-19 infection death rate 0:00618 Fitted b1 force of infection 2:51 10 7 Fitted b2 proportion of people identified as suspected cases 0.”
- COVID-19: what has been learned and to be learned about the novel coronavirus disease (2020, background): “23 [48], whereas the R0 of SARS-CoV only ranged from 2 to 4 [49].”
- Quarantine alone or in combination with other public health measures to control COVID‐19: a rapid review (2020, neutral): “Tang 2020a {published data only} Tang B, Wang X, Li Q, Bragazzi NL, Tang S, Xiao Y, et al. Estimation of the transmission risk of the 2019-nCoV and its implication for public health interventions.”
- The SARS-CoV-2 outbreak: What we know (2020, background): “Recently, a large group of researchers from multiple institutes led by Jianhong Wu from York University[30] proposed a more general Jo ur na l P re -p ro of deterministic SEIR compartmental model using more parameters, and arrived at a much higher R0 number of 6.47.”
- Epidemic analysis of COVID-19 in China by dynamical modeling (2020, methodology): “There are also notable generalizations of SEIR model for evaluation of the transmission risk and prediction of patient number, in which model, each group is divided into two subpopulations, the quarantined and unquarantined 23, 24 .”
- An updated estimation of the risk of transmission of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCov) (2020, positive): “Previously, our group has devised a deterministic compartmental (SEIR) model (Tang et al., 2020).”
- Deep learning-based model for detecting 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia on high-resolution computed tomography: a prospective study (2020, methodology): “47.[23-26] It could be inferred that before radiologists fulfilling the demands of existing 305 patients, newly infected cases would appear, and the overall burden of radiologists is more 306 overwhelming like a growing snowball.”
- Social reaction toward the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) (2020, background): “With the number of people infected by the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19), which is rapidly increasing worldwide,[1] public anxieties and worries are elevated in many regions.”
- A SIR model assumption for the spread of COVID-19 in different communities (2020, neutral): “Since then, it has become a pandemic declared by World Health Organization (WHO) on March 11, which has spread around the globe [1, 2, 3, 4, 5].”
- Spread and dynamics of the COVID-19 epidemic in Italy: Effects of emergency containment measures (2020, background): “This is true, in particular, for the critical compartments of asymptomatic (5, 6, 9, 28) and of presymptom infectious individuals (see below).”