Asked and Answered: Questioning Children in the Courtroom

By Rachel Zajac, Julien Gross, Harlene Hayne. 2003

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Law, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a715c38238be6d0b9b7f756923512049b0435587

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Paul D. Cannan
2. Becky Milne
3. Ray Bull
4. Rachel Zajac

In Law

1. Paul D. Cannan
2. Rachel Zajac

In Social Psychology

1. Paul D. Cannan
2. Becky Milne
3. Ray Bull
4. Rachel Zajac
5. Aldert Vrij

Citations in the corpus

• Cross-Examination of Sexual Assault Complainants: A Developmental Comparison (2009, methodology): “Consistent with Zajac et al. (2003), changes were especially likely to be elicited by the very questions that define cross-examination: credibilitychallenging questions.”
• Interviewing Victims of Crime, Including Children and People with Intellectual Disabilities (2006, background): “People who have been victimized, especially children (Young, Powell & Dudgeon, 2003; Zalac, Gross & Hayne, 2003 ) and adults with intellectual disability are even more likely to go along with leading questions (Kebbell, Hatton & Johnson, 2004).”