Dependence modelling for spatial extremes
By Jennifer L. Wadsworth, Jonathan A. Tawn. 2012
199 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Demography, Economics and Econometrics, Finance
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a6f036d9f69f9957610bc476b6c5a4fd5cc040a2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Demography
- Raphaël Huser
- A. C. Davison
- Emeric Thibaud
- Thomas Opitz
- Marc G. Genton
- Mathieu Ribatet
- Raphaël Mutzner
- Jennifer L. Wadsworth
In Economics and Econometrics
- Raphaël Huser
- Thomas Opitz
- Emeric Thibaud
- A. C. Davison
- Marc G. Genton
- Jennifer L. Wadsworth
- Raphaël Mutzner
- Mathieu Ribatet
In Finance
- Raphaël Huser
- Thomas Opitz
- Emeric Thibaud
- Marc G. Genton
- A. C. Davison
- Jennifer L. Wadsworth
- Mathieu Ribatet
- Raphaël Mutzner
Citations in the corpus
- Geostatistics of Dependent and Asymptotically Independent Extremes (2013, methodology): “For space-time data, hybrid models (Wadsworth and Tawn 2012) can capture different asymptotic properties at different distances and time lags, but they may be quite difficult to fit in practice.”
- Statistical Modeling of Spatial Extremes (2012, methodology): “Wadsworth and Tawn (2012) tackle this important topic.”
- Space–time modelling of extreme events (2012, background): “Wadsworth and Tawn (2012) have proposed models that can handle both asymptotic independence and asymptotic dependence, and it seems entirely feasible to extend our approach to them.”
- INLA goes extreme: Bayesian tail regression for the estimation of high spatio-temporal quantiles (2018, background): “…well-suited to properly capture space-time dependence, and it would be interesting to extend our methodological framework to more complex spatial (Wadsworth and Tawn, 2012; Thibaud et al. , 2013; Thibaud and Opitz, 2015; Huser et al. , 2017; Castro Camilo and Huser, 2017; Huser and Wadsworth,…”
- Modeling asymptotically independent spatial extremes based on Laplace random fields (2015, methodology): “Useful models pertaining to this framework are obtained by inverting max-stable processes (Wadsworth and Tawn, 2012), allowing for composite likelihood inference.”
- Bridging asymptotic independence and dependence in spatial extremes using Gaussian scale mixtures (2016, background): “Al-ternatively, Wadsworth and Tawn (2012) proposed inverted max-stable models, which were found to be slightly more flexible than Gaussian processes in some applications (Thibaud et al., 2013; Davison et al., 2013), but are as difficult to fit as max-stable models.”
- Non-Stationary Dependence Structures for Spatial Extremes (2014, methodology): “One possibility would be to “invert” the non-stationary max-stable models proposed above (see Wadsworth and Tawn, 2012; Davison et al., 2013).”
- Modeling Spatial Processes with Unknown Extremal Dependence Class (2017, methodology): “Then the process W (s) = 1/Gs{M(s)} has an inverted max-stable copula (Ledford and Tawn, 1996; Wadsworth and Tawn, 2012), Pareto margins, and coefficient of tail dependence ηW (h) = 1/θ(h).”
- Likelihood estimators for multivariate extremes (2014, background): “Alternatively, a partially censored pairwise likelihood was proposed by Wadsworth and Tawn (2012).”
- Threshold modeling of extreme spatial rainfall (2013, methodology): “In the threshold approach, if the threshold is chosen too low, the dependence structure may not have converged to the max-stable limit.”
- Evaluating environmental joint extremes for the offshore industry (2012, background): “Furthermore, Wadsworth and Tawn (2012) propose the adoption of inverted multivariate extreme value distributions with which to admit hybrid extremal dependence structures within the framework of max-stable processes.”