Methane observations from the Greenhouse Gases Observing SATellite: Comparison to ground‐based TCCON data and model calculations

By R. Parker, H. Boesch, A. Cogan, A. Fraser, Liang Feng, Paul I. Palmer, J. Messerschmidt, N. Deutscher, D. Griffith, J. Notholt and 2 more. 2011

252 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Methane retrievals from Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) shortwave infrared measurements: Performance comparison of proxy and physics retrieval algorithms (2012, methodology): “This method has been extensively used for methane retrievals from SCIAMACHY [ Frankenberg et al. , 2005, 2008; Bergamaschi et al. , 2007; Schneising et al. , 2009] and more recently it has been applied to methane retrievals from GOSAT [ Parker et al. , 2011].”
Balancing aggregation and smoothing errors in inverse models (2015, methodology): “…with aggregation following the central limit theorem (Turner et al., 2015) The observational error covariance matrix is also diagonal and speciﬁed as the scene-speciﬁc retrieval error from Parker et al. (2011), which dominates the total observational error as shown by Turner et al. (2015 .”