Reforming Welfare and Rewarding Work: Final Report on the Minnesota Family Investment Program, Vol.

By Charles J. Miller, V. Knox, L. Gennetian, Martey S. Dodoo, Janet L. Hunter, Cindy Redcross. 2000

162 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

How Welfare and Work Policies for Parents Affect Adolescents: A Synthesis of Research. (2002, background): “, 2000), and the other was a study of the Minnesota Family Investment Program (Gennetian and Miller, 2000).”
Child Care Assistance Policies Can Affect the Use of Center-Based Care for Children in Low-Income Families (2005, methodology): “Minnesota’s Family Investment Program (MFIP) study tested two programs: full MFIP, which included a mandatory requirement to participate in employment-related services and financial incentives; and MFIP Incentives only, which included all of the features of full MFIP except mandatory employment serv”
A Unified Welfare Analysis of Government Policies* (2019, unknown): “…Mixed-Initial-Activity Programs GAIN LA 1988 31 x Freedman et al. (1996) Greenberg et al. (2010) Welfare to Work Minnesota Earnings Supplement Programs MFIP 1994 29 x Greenberg et al. (2010) Miller et al. (2000) Welfare to Work Portland Mandatory Mixed-Initial-Activity Programs NEWWS Port.”