Psychological, sociodemographic, and infrastructural factors as determinants of ecological impact caused by mobility behavior

By M. Hunecke, S. Haustein, Sylvie Grischkat, Susanne Böhler. 2007

192 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a6daa35705e5d8fa13e539121e02549cda06c4ec

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Citations in the corpus

Good Intents, but Low Impacts: Diverging Importance of Motivational and Socioeconomic Determinants Explaining Pro-Environmental Behavior, Energy Use, and Carbon Footprint (2018, background): “Behavior-specific motivational variables might display stronger links with high-impact behaviors (e.g., as found in Hunecke et al., 2007, for daily transportation) than we found for environmental selfidentity.”
A push to cycling—exploring the e-bike's role in overcoming barriers to bicycle use with a survey and an intervention study (2017, background): “…pro-environmental behavior at the strategic level, such as decisions about car type (Flamm, 2009; Nayum & Klockner, 2014; Peters, Gutscher, & Scholz, 2011) as well as at tactical levels, such as decisions about travel mode (Bamberg & Schmidt, 2003; Hunecke et al. 2007; Klockner & Matthies, 2009).”
Moving towards sustainability? Mobility styles, attitudes and individual travel behaviour (2011, background): “Other approaches developed a more comprehensive index for the sustainability of a household (e.g. Donegan et al. 2007) or calculated an indicator for the ecological impact of travel behaviour like overall annual emissions (e.g. Hunecke et al. 2007).”
Identifying target groups for environmentally sustainable transport: assessment of different segmentation approaches (2013, unknown): “Among the most important dimensions of behaviour theory are the constructs of the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) [33–39], the construct of personal norm derived from Schwartz’s [40] Norm Activation Theory (NAT) [39,41–43], and attitudes covering the symbolic-affective evaluation of different tran”