Jumping genera: the phylogenetic positions of Cassytha, Hypodaphnis, and Neocinnamomum (Lauraceae) based on different analyses of trnK intron sequences
By J. Rohwer, B. Rudolph. 2005
106 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a6cfd98e9ce35acbbca00c7f9c775bf6e6cc254a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- J. Doyle
- P. K. Endress
- Daniel L. Nickrent
- Chelsea D. Specht
- Pamela S. Soltis
- Thomas Borsch
- D. Soltis
- E. M. Friis
Citations in the corpus
- Integrating Early Cretaceous fossils into the phylogeny of living angiosperms: Magnoliidae and eudicots (2010, methodology): “We scored Lauraceae as inferior because Rohwer & Rudolph (2005) reconstructed this as the ancestral state in the family, being found in the basal genus Hypodaphnis and members of the next most basal “Cryptocarya group”; they inferred that reversals to a superior ovary occurred within the…”
- Parasitic angiosperms: How often and how many? (2020, background): “An early molecular phylogenetic study using chloroplast genes (Rohwer, 2000) showed Cassytha to be an early-branching member of Lauraceae; however, other analyses (Renner & Chanderbali, 2000; Rohwer & Rudolph, 2005) showed it was nested with woody members of the family.”