Emotion, attachment, and bereavement: A conceptual commentary.

By Phillip R. Shaver, Caroline M. Tancredy. 2001

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a6cf9033798e209cb17e4b9a88abfe8667e628c4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. R. Neimeyer
2. G. Bonanno
3. Margaret Stroebe
4. Henk Schut
5. Wolfgang Stroebe
6. J. Gillies
7. C. Wortman
8. D. Carr

Citations in the corpus

• Paving the way: From early attachment theory to contemporary bereavement research (2002, background): “Furthermore, they would “be able to provide a coherent account of their loss-related experiences (unlike unresolved/disorganized individuals)” (Shaver & Tancredy, 2001: 80).”
• Resilience to loss and chronic grief: a prospective study from preloss to 18-months postloss. (2002, background): “In a related vein, Shaver and Tancredy (2001) suggested that individuals with an avoidant or dismissing attach- 1 There are a number of possible methods that might be used to identify distinct patterns of grief reaction.”
• Attachment in Coping with Bereavement: A Theoretical Integration (2005, methodology): “More recently, Archer (1999), Parkes (2001), and Shaver and Tancredy (2001) have suggested that individual differences in reactions to loss of a love partner during adulthood are related to attachment representations of the partner in terms of the secure and insecure styles of attachment, as…”
• Presence in absence. The ambiguous phenomenology of grief (2018, background): “From an attachment perspective, this searching behavior may be taken to show that on the affective level, the lost loved one is registered as simply missing, not as dead (Archer 1999; Shaver and Tancredy 2001).”
• Loss, Grief, and the Search for Significance: Toward a Model of Meaning Reconstruction in Bereavement (2006, background): “…implication of attachment theory for bereavement research is that styles of attachment developed in childhood relationships—secure, anxious/ambivalent, dismissing, and 34 J. Gillies and R. A. Neimeyer unresolved/disorganized—can affect one’s response to subsequent losses (Shaver & Tancredy, 2001).”