String theory and quintessence

By S. Hellerman, N. Kaloper, L. Susskind. 2001

244 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We discuss the obstacles for defining a set of observable quantities analogous to an S-matrix which are needed to formulate string theory in an accelerating universe. We show that the quintessence models with the equations of state −1 < w < −1/3 have future horizons and may be no better suited to an S-matrix or S-vector description. We also show that in a class of theories with a stable supersymmetric vacuum, a system cannot relax into a zero-energy supersymmetric vacuum while accelerating if the evolution is dominated by a single scalar field with a stable potential. Thus describing an eternally accelerating universe may be a challenge for string theory as presently defined.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a6c5dc6287add1d4d65865df9ad1e1690ca9fcc0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Andrei Linde
  2. E. Silverstein
  3. V. Hubeny
  4. R. Myers
  5. M. Rangamani
  6. D. Harlow
  7. R. Kallosh
  8. S. Kachru

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. Andrei Linde
  2. V. Hubeny
  3. E. Silverstein
  4. D. Harlow
  5. R. Myers
  6. M. Rangamani
  7. J. Maldacena
  8. T. Takayanagi

Citations in the corpus