Review of the membrane and bipolar plates materials for conventional and unitized regenerative fuel cells

By Salwan S. Dihrab, Kamaruzzaman Sopian, M. Alghoul, M. Y. Sulaiman. 2009

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a6bea4680b72fd7cc8042075edca365879064cde

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Dennis Y. C. Leung
2. F. Brito
3. J. Xuan
4. Á. Cunha
5. Nuno Rodrigues
6. Huizhi Wang
7. Yifei Wang
8. J. Martins

In Materials Chemistry

1. Dennis Y. C. Leung

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. Dennis Y. C. Leung
2. J. Xuan
3. Huizhi Wang
4. Yifei Wang

Citations in the corpus

• Vanadium redox flow batteries: a technology review (2015, background): “However, it also has a few disadvantages because it is a brittle material, which hampers the assembly of the stack, increases the cost of machining and, being porous, requires the use of thick bipolar plates [132].”
• A review on unitized regenerative fuel cell technologies, part B: Unitized regenerative alkaline fuel cell, solid oxide fuel cell, and microfluidic fuel cell (2017, methodology): “[2] Dihrab SS, Sopian K, Alghoul MA, Sulaiman MY.”