Are the debates on water privatization missing the point? Experiences from Africa, Asia and Latin America

By J. Budds, G. McGranahan. 2003

438 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ocean Engineering, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a6b53ded2a1e14d78461324b4c384609bfe59741

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ocean Engineering

1. D. Dodman
2. D. Satterthwaite
3. K. Bakker
4. D. Ciplet
5. Janis Roberts

In Political Science and International Relations

1. N. E. Shofiani
2. M. Kooy
3. E. Martijn
4. D. Satterthwaite
5. K. Bakker
6. M. Zeitoun
7. R. Duffy
8. E. Corbera

In Strategy and Management

1. K. Bakker

Citations in the corpus

• Governance Failure: Rethinking the Institutional Dimensions of Urban Water Supply to Poor Households (2008, background): “…allows identification of institutional barriers common to both the public and private sectors (which suggests that the debate over the relative merits of public versus private ownership and/or management of water supply systems has, to some degree, missed the point (Budds & McGranahan, 2003).”
• Institutional Capacity, Climate Change Adaptation and the Urban Poor (2009, background): “This can take the form of financial, technical, logistical and legal support to facilitate strategic actions to address climate change that is fully integrated with development and investment plans – the benefits of which have previously been seen in facilitating improvements to service delivery (Bu”