Youth on Trial: A Developmental Perspective on Juvenile Justice

By T. Grisso, R. Schwartz. 2000

189 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Youth Development and Reentry (2004, background): “We know, for example, that the cognitive capacity, maturity, and psychosocial context of youth, especially those who come in contact with the justice system, can differ considerably from those of adults (Grisso & Schwartz, 2000).”
Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: an experimental study. (2005, background): “These authors suggest that typical laboratory studies of risky decision making fail to consider the emotional and social contexts in which risk taking actually occurs (Cauffman & Steinberg, 2000; Scott, Reppucci, & Woolard, 1995; Steinberg, 2004; Steinberg & Cauffman, 1996).”
AN EXAMINATION OF THE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION AND NOTIFICATION ACT AS APPLIED TO JUVENILES Evaluating the Ability to Predict Sexual Recidivism (2008, background): “In this way, SORNA represents a significant step in continuing the general trend of treating juvenile offenses as equivalent to adult crimes (Garfinkle, 2003; Grisso & Schwartz, 2003).”
A META-ANALYTIC REVIEW OF COMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL RESEARCH (2011, background): “Competency to stand trial evaluations have been regarded as " the most significant mental health inquiry pursued in the system of criminal law " (Stone, 1975, p. 200) with the number conducted throughout the Unites States each year estimated to be approximately 60,000 (Bonnie & Grisso, 2000).”