Matching Pixels Using Co-occurrence Statistics
By Rotal Kat, Roy Josef Jevnisek, Shai Avidan. 2018
39 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We propose a new error measure for matching pixels that is based on co-occurrence statistics. The measure relies on a co-occurrence matrix that counts the number of times pairs of pixel values co-occur within a window. The error incurred by matching a pair of pixels is inversely proportional to the probability that their values co-occur together, and not their color difference. This measure also works with features other than color, e.g. deep features. We show that this improves the state-of-the-art performance of template matching on standard benchmarks. We then propose an embedding scheme that maps the input image to an embedded image such that the Euclidean distance between pixel values in the embedded space resembles the co-occurrence statistics in the original space. This lets us run existing vision algorithms on the embedded images and enjoy the power of co-occurrence statistics for free. We demonstrate this on two algorithms, the Lucas-Kanade image registration and the Kernelized Correlation Filter (KCF) tracker. Experiments show that performance of each algorithm improves by about 10%.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Christian Rupprecht
- Yuki M. Asano
- Andrea Vedaldi
- Luc Van Gool
- Andrew Zisserman
- Dacheng Tao
- Xiaogang Wang
- Trevor Darrell
Citations in the corpus
- A critical analysis of self-supervision, or what we can learn from a single image (2019, background): “Example applications that only rely on low-level feature extractors include template matching (Kat et al., 2018; Talmi et al., 2017) and style transfer (Gatys et al.”