A high-resolution code for turbulent boundary layers

By Mark P. Simens, Javier Jiménez, Sergio Hoyas, Yoshinori Mizuno. Journal of Computational Physics, 2009

307 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Environmental Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a68ef7a2e271f1744bceda984b86be8383e661ae

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aerospace Engineering

In Computational Mechanics

In Environmental Engineering

Citations in the corpus

Low-frequency unsteadiness in shock wave–turbulent boundary layer interaction (2012, background): “Concerning the driving mechanism for the unsteadiness, we conjecture that the observed response of the STBLI system could be linked to a global instability in the downstream separated flow.”
Velocity statistics in turbulent channel flow up to $Re_{\tau }=4000$ (2014, background): “eddy turnover time in the outer layer (Simens et al. 2009).”
Hydrodynamic stability and breakdown of the viscous regime over riblets (2011, methodology): “The Taylor–Green vortex was used to test the time accuracy of the integrator, which was found to be second order for the velocity and first order for the pressure, with the second-order velocity errors mostly associated with viscous terms, as in most incompressible fractional-step Runge–Kutta scheme”
Turbulence in supersonic boundary layers at moderate Reynolds number (2011, methodology): “As shown by Simens et al. (2009), the characteristic spatial scale for complete boundary layer decorrelation is approximately 30–50 boundary layer thicknesses, which mandates the use of extremely long computational domains.”
Turbulent boundary layers at moderate Reynolds numbers: inflow length and tripping effects (2012, methodology): “In accordance with the picture for the r.m.s. profile, differences at Reθ = 1100 between the various cases, with the TS case being again closest to the profile by Simens et al. (2009), have diminished before reaching Reθ = 2000.”
Simulations of Spatially Evolving Turbulent Boundary Layers up to Reθ = 4300 (2010, background): “hybrid approaches such as detached-eddy simulation (DES, Spalart (2009)), or specific near-wall SGS models (Chung and Pullin, 2009).”
Assessment of direct numerical simulation data of turbulent boundary layers (2010, methodology): “…recycling and rescaling (introduced by Lund, Wu & Squires 1998) of the turbulence from a more downstream position (Ferrante & Elghobashi 2005; Simens et al. 2009), inducing laminar-turbulent transition via free-stream disturbances (Wu & Moin 2009), and triggering laminar-turbulent transition…”
Very-large-scale motions in a turbulent boundary layer (2010, result): “This finding agrees with that of Simens et al. (2009), who found that the effects of the numerical inflow condition based on Lund’s method, which are probably comparable with the effects of experimental tripping, induce a”